The crop inspection that holds up
when the payment depends on it.
In crop insurance and rural credit programs, the money does not move without the agronomist's report. uInspect runs every field inspection through a single track, from dispatch to audited report, with photos geotagged at the right plot and a sketch over the map. Your operation stops depending on a sheet of paper signed in the field and starts delivering evidence that survives a dispute.
The indemnity only moves after the inspection. And the inspection comes out on paper.
The report is filled out on paper, in the middle of the field, and retyped days later.
If the grower disagrees, they write by hand on the report itself, and not showing up counts as tacit acceptance.
Photos sit loose on the phone and get dumped in a drive, with no guarantee of where they came from, when, or from which plot.
The audio note with the findings disappears into WhatsApp, along with the rest of the evidence.
From the plot to the report, everything runs through uInspect
The inspection drops to the agronomist in the field, already with the right property and plot. They capture offline at the plot, with geotagged photos and a sketch over the map, and the audited report comes out ready on completion.
From request to auditable report.
- 1 The inspection drops to the agronomist in the field, already with the property, the plot and the right report template.
- 2 They drive the route even without signal: the app works offline and logs the route and distance traveled, evidence they were at the property.
- 3 Capture at the right plot: photo, video and audio through the camera, with GPS, date and time recorded on the image, and a sketch with the plot polygon in GeoJSON and KML.
- 4 The report is born in the field, with expense entries and chat with the operation, and comes out ready and traceable on completion.
The capabilities that turn the inspection into evidence.
The same horizontal platform, with the features this industry actually uses. Everything inside the inspection, not in spreadsheets and scattered chats.
Works offline in the field and syncs by itself on reconnection, so a field with no signal does not stall the inspection.
Photos with GPS, date and time recorded on the image and logged provenance, so the evidence is born reliable at the right plot.
Sketch and plot over the map in GeoJSON and KML, with offline maps, to mark the findings at the exact spot of the loss.
Audio and video findings attached to the inspection and traceable through to the report, so the agronomist's word gets out of WhatsApp.
The report generated in the app on completion, with chain of custody, so the evidence backs the release instead of a scribbled sheet.
Travel expenses with a photo of the receipt and chat with the operation inside the inspection itself, to run the whole season from a single dashboard.
Concrete use cases in this industry.
Crop inspection for rural credit release before planting or funding.
Loss verification in government crop programs, with geotagged evidence of the damage at the plot.
Property inspection for crop insurance underwriting and policy renewal.
Preliminary field inspection after the notice of loss, within the regulatory window.
Batch quality checks on receiving, to release payment to the grower.
Field inspection deadlines in crop insurance
In crop insurance, policies require a field inspection by an agronomist, and local regulations set short windows for the preliminary inspection after the notice of loss. In Brazil that window is 20 business days. The season runs against that clock, and every day of delay in the field is a day of delay in the release.
The inspection that holds up, side by side with today's.
- Reports filled out on paper, in the field
- Loose photos on the phone, with no origin
- The findings audio lost in WhatsApp
- Scribbled evidence when the grower disputes
- The report born in the app, in the field
- Photos with GPS, date and time at the right plot
- Findings attached and traceable through to the report
- Evidence with a chain of custody that holds up
Evidence is born trustworthy at capture, and the buyer controls what it releases.
Every photo leaves capture with its provenance, GPS, date and time, and the inspection carries the questionnaire and the chain of custody of the media all the way to the report. With document bureau checks (individuals and companies), anti-fraud stops being a talking point: it is provenance plus a verified document. More than 100,000 inspections on record, and more than 15,000 per crop season, all to the same standard. The report stops being a loose sheet and becomes evidence that holds up when disputed, and the payer controls what it releases.
uInspect runs any crop inspection workflow and delivers evidence that survives a dispute. On-site is the workhorse modality in the field; the same platform runs remote inspection by video and self-inspection when the case allows, with the same standard of evidence.
Questions from teams operating in agriculture and harvest.
Does the app work without signal in the field?
Yes. The app captures, fills the report and draws the sketch without a connection, and syncs by itself on reconnection. The agronomist works at the plot, not hunting for signal bars, and nothing is lost when the signal returns.
How does a photo of the crop become evidence?
The photo arrives with GPS, date and time recorded on the image, captured through the camera at the exact plot. When it comes from the gallery, its provenance is logged with the device data. The evidence is born with an origin, not as a loose photo nobody can place.
Can the plot and the loss be marked on the map?
Yes. The sketch is drawn over the map, with the property and plot polygons in GeoJSON and KML, and offline maps. The agronomist marks the findings at the spot where the loss is, not in a generic remark.
What happens when the grower or the reinsurer disputes?
The report comes out with a chain of custody: every photo, audio and video is traceable from capture to document, with the route traveled and the coordinates of each piece of evidence. Instead of a scribbled sheet, the operation presents a trail that holds up before the counterparty.
How does uInspect handle fraud in crop inspection?
Through provenance and documents. The provenance of the media is logged at capture (GPS, date and time, origin of the image) and bureau checks verify the individuals and companies involved. Anti-fraud is evidence of origin plus verified documents, not a promise of artificial intelligence over the photo.
Does it replace my insurance or credit system?
No. uInspect is the field inspection and evidence layer of your system. It delivers the audited report and the geotagged evidence, and integrates via API with the operation you already run, from inspection dispatch to release.
Can it handle peak season volume?
Yes. The season comes in waves: concentrated volume, short deadlines and everyone in the field at once. The same infrastructure has run more than 15,000 inspections in a single season, within more than 100,000 inspections accumulated on the platform.
The same evidence, in any inspection mode.
This industry starts with the mode that makes the most sense, but the platform is one. Explore the three modes, or see the other industry solutions.
Put evidence at the center of your agriculture and harvest operation.
Talk to the team and see uInspect running on your use case.