When the claim is disputed,
your report holds up.
Risk inspection drives underwriting, renewal and claim payment. Today it runs on the engineer's WhatsApp, with reports in personal formats and recommendations nobody tracks. uInspect runs large risk inspection through a single track, from request to audited report: evidence is born reliable at capture and every risk recommendation has an owner and a deadline.
Between the engineer's visit and the decision, it is a black box.
Fragile evidence in a disputed claim: the operation runs on personal phones, photos travel through WhatsApp which compresses the image, and when the large loss goes to court the report falls apart under technical challenge.
Reports vary by engineer: each one writes in their own format, and without a master checklist per plant type you cannot compare two sites in the same portfolio.
Risk recommendations with no follow-up: the engineer closes the visit with dozens of recommendations per plant and nobody tracks whether they get done.
Dispersed portfolio, slow reporting: one client can have dozens of plants across multiple regions, and the consolidated report takes weeks to come out.
From acceptance to audited report, everything runs through uInspect
The insurer opens the request with the master checklist for that plant type, and the inspection happens with evidence at the source. At the end, a report comparable across engineers, with every risk recommendation under a deadline and an owner.
From request to auditable report.
- 1 The request comes in standardized through the dashboard, by email or by API, with the master checklist for that plant type already attached.
- 2 The engineer goes to the field with evidence at the source: an offline app, capture that opens in the native camera with GPS, date and time recorded on the image, and provenance logged when media comes from the gallery.
- 3 The report is born comparable and auditable: the questionnaire is answered in the field, the report is generated on completion, and the chain of custody runs from the media to the file.
- 4 Each recommendation becomes a task with an owner, a deadline and per-stage automation, and the verification reinspection closes the loop in the same case file.
The capabilities that turn the inspection into evidence.
The same horizontal platform, with the features this industry actually uses. Everything inside the inspection, not in spreadsheets and scattered chats.
Evidence that survives technical challenge: capture at the source with GPS, date and time recorded on the image, and the provenance of every file logged, whether from the camera or the gallery
Recommendations nobody used to track now carry a deadline and an owner: each one becomes a task in the process engine, with per-stage automation and a verification reinspection
Reports comparable across every engineer: a master checklist per plant type, with conditional logic and more than one questionnaire per inspection
A dispersed portfolio under control: volume, deadlines and productivity per workspace, in a dashboard with a consolidated view of plants across regions
Assisted remote inspection to validate hard-to-reach sites live, without burning an expensive site visit on every plant
Fits into your system: API and webhooks open inspections and return the report, photos and answers to your underwriting and claims workflow, without becoming yet another silo
Concrete use cases in this industry.
Pre-quote risk inspection for underwriting industrial and property risks
Periodic risk maintenance inspection across a large risk portfolio
Claims adjusting with a traceable report that stands up to technical challenge
Follow-up on risk recommendations with a verification reinspection
Remote triage inspection for dispersed, hard-to-reach portfolios
Adversarial scrutiny in large-loss claims
A report produced unilaterally falls apart under scrutiny when a large loss goes to court. Here a lost dispute does not cost a software subscription, it costs the claim. Evidence has to be born reliable at capture to hold up.
The inspection that holds up, side by side with today's.
- Photos over WhatsApp, compressed and with no origin
- Each engineer's report in their own format
- Recommendations with no owner and no deadline
- Dispersed portfolio with no consolidated view
- Capture at the source with GPS, date and time on the image
- A master checklist that makes the portfolio comparable
- Every recommendation with an owner, a deadline and a reinspection
- The whole portfolio in one dashboard, with remote inspection where travel does not pay
Evidence is born trustworthy at capture, and the buyer controls what it releases.
Every photo leaves capture with its provenance, GPS, date and time, and the inspection carries the questionnaire and the chain of custody of the media all the way to the report. With document bureau checks (individuals and companies), anti-fraud stops being a talking point: it is provenance plus a verified document. More than 100,000 inspections on record, and more than 15,000 per crop season, all to the same standard. The report stops being a loose sheet and becomes evidence that holds up when disputed, and the payer controls what it releases.
uInspect delivers the traceable risk inspection and the structured data. Risk pricing, the underwriting decision and the technical methodology stay with the insurer and the risk engineer.
Questions from teams operating in large risk insurance.
Does uInspect replace the insurer's underwriting or claims system?
No. It is the auditable inspection layer that plugs into the system the insurer already uses via API, opening inspections and returning the report, the photos and the answers, without becoming yet another silo. Pricing and the underwriting decision stay with you.
How does the evidence hold up when the claim is disputed?
The evidence is born at capture, in the native camera, with GPS, date and time recorded on the image, and the provenance of every file is logged, whether it comes from the camera or the gallery. Everything stays traceable through to the report, with a chain of custody from capture to file. That is what separates a report that holds up under challenge from a unilateral report that falls apart.
Can we track risk recommendations through to the fix?
Yes. Each recommendation becomes a task in the process engine, with an owner, a deadline and per-stage automation. The verification reinspection closes the item in the same case file, so you stop discovering at claim time that a recommendation was never executed.
How does the operation stay standardized across in-house and third-party engineers?
The master checklist per plant type is configurable, with conditional logic and more than one questionnaire per inspection. In-house or contracted, every engineer answers the same model, so the portfolio stays comparable and underwriting decides on reports that speak the same language.
What if the plant has no internet signal?
The app works offline. The engineer records photos, videos, audio and answers at the plant with no network, and everything syncs on reconnection, without losing the provenance of any file or the order of capture.
How does uInspect help with a portfolio spread across regions?
The whole portfolio sits in one dashboard, with volume, deadlines and productivity per workspace. For what does not require an engineer on site, assisted remote inspection validates live over video, with guided capture and evidence born on the call, without burning an expensive site visit on every plant.
How do you validate the documentary side of the inspection?
Bureau checks on individuals and companies reinforce document verification inside the workflow. The reliability of the evidence comes from the provenance of each file, GPS, date, time and logged origin, combined with documents checked against the bureau, all inside the same case file.
The same evidence, in any inspection mode.
This industry starts with the mode that makes the most sense, but the platform is one. Explore the three modes, or see the other industry solutions.
Put evidence at the center of your large risk insurance operation.
Talk to the team and see uInspect running on your use case.